CAPM Anomalies Analysis in Respect of Hierarchical Bayesian Approach

Document Type : applied

Author

lecturer, Management Department, Payam noor University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of investors gets rational returns for investing in firms' stocks. Stock price or changes in it is one of the criteria for decision-making about buying and selling stocks. This study has tried to access capital asset pricing anomalies in TSE. The sample consisted of112 selected companies during the years 1384-1394. Firm characteristics as of anomalies include firm size, book value to market value, momentum, net marginal profit, asset growth rate, and the share issue. The hierarchical Bayesian approach in modeling conditional alpha on the company as a function of the characteristics of the company has been introduced. The results of the study show the existence of anomalies in the capital asset pricing model in separate analysis of characteristics. But the effect at the simultaneous analysis of the characteristics is reduced. The results indicate that there is a direct relationship between stock returns and four variables named book value to market value, momentum, net marginal profit and share issue but the relations between stock returns, firm size and growth rate of assets, would be inverse.
JEL: G10, G12, G14
How to cite this paper: Tabatabaei, S. J (2017). CAPM Anomalies Analysis in Respect of Hierarchical Bayesian Approach. Quarterly Journal of Risk Modeling and Financial Engineering, 2(2), 179– 196. (In Persian)

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ang, A., & Chen, J. (2007). CAPM Over the Long Run: 1926–2001. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(14), 1–40.
Ang, A., Liu, J., & Schwarz, K. (2010). Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor Models. Working Paper, ColumbiaUniversity.
Asima, M, & Abbaszadeh Asl, A. (2017). A Comparison between Performance of Linear and Nonlinear Capital Asset Pricing Models in TSE. Quarterly Journal of Risk Modeling and Financial Engineering, 1(1), 114–128. (In Persian).
Avramov, D., & Chordia, T. (2006). Asset Pricing Models and Financial Market Anomalies. Review of Financial Studies, 3(19), 1001–1040.
Binachi, D. (2015). A Dynamic Test of Conditional Asset Pricing Models, Working Paper, Warwick Business School.
Campbell, J., Hilscher, J. (2008), In Search of Distress Risk. Journal of Finance, 6(63), 2899-2939.
Daniel, K., & Titman, S.(2015). Market Reactions to Tangible and Intangible Information. Journal of Finance, 4(61), 1605-1643.
Fama, E., & French, K. (1992). The Cross-section of Expected StockReturns, Journal of Finance, 2(47), 427-465.
Fama, E., & French, K. (2008). Dissecting Anomalies. Journal of Finance, 4(63), 1653–1678.
Ferson, W., & Foster, S. (1994). Finite Sample Properties of the Generalized Method of Moments in Tests of Conditional Asset Pricing Models. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 1(36), 29–56.
Harvey, C., Liu, Y., & Zhu, H. (2014). and the Cross-section of Expected Returns, Working paper, Duke University.
Hou, K., Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2016). Digesting Anomalies: An Investment Approach. Review of Financial Studies, 28 (3), 650-705.
Hou, K., Chen., X, & Zhang. (2017). Replicating Anomalies. The 2017 Chicago Quantitative Alliance Academic Competition.
Jagannathan, R., & Wang, Z.(1996). The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-section of Expected Returns. Journal of Finance,1(51), 3-53.
Kogan, L., & Tian, M. (2013). Firm Characteristics and Empirical Factor Models: A Data Mining Experiment. Working paper, MIT.
Lewellen, J., Nagel, S., & Shanken, J. (2010). A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset-pricing Tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 2(96), 175–194.
McLean, D., & Pontiff, J.(2013). Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?. Working Paper, University of Alberta.
Mojtahedzadeh, V., & Ghodrati, M. (2011). The Effect of Accruals Anomalies on Stock Price. Quarterly Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 3(10),119-135.(In Persian).
Rahnamay Roodposhti F., & Amirhosseini Z. (2010). Explanation of Capital Asset pricing: Comparison between Models, Quarterly journal of Accounting and Auditing Review. 17(62), 49-68. (in Persian).
Rossi, P., Allenby, G., & McCulloch, R. (2006). Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. West Sussex, England, John Wiley & Sons.